[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Names for Office b0xen
- To: Chris Peredun <cp@cleannorth.org>
- Subject: Re: Names for Office b0xen
- From: Dan Brosemer <odin@cleannorth.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:57:39 -0400
- Battlestar-Galactica-Date: 46584 centons, 11 microns, 14.51 lutefisk
- Cc: techies@lists.cleannorth.org
- In-Reply-To: <3B4CAEE8.9DA99F59@cleannorth.org>; from cp@cleannorth.org on Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 03:54:16PM -0400
- List-Help: http://lists.cleannorth.org/
- List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.cleannorth.org/
- Mail-Followup-To: techies@lists.cleannorth.org
- References: <3B4CAEE8.9DA99F59@cleannorth.org>
- Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:11:27 -0400
- Resent-From: techies@lists.cleannorth.org
- Resent-Message-ID: <L-Mg5C.A.FZ.vLLT7@skirnir>
- Resent-Sender: techies-request@lists.cleannorth.org
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Things have names that are addressed on the network. The Exabyte drive isn't, and neither is the harcopy logger. The UPSs _really_ aren't. The one exception is "FRED" and I'll publicly state that I had no part in that. We're running out of good names, anyway. (keep in mind that R2-D2 and C3PO are retired). -Dan On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 03:54:16PM -0400, Chris Peredun wrote: > Seems like everything's got a handle except for a couple: > > The lineprinter on the server rack > The backup unit > > Since all the other b0xen have names, why not these two? > > Ah, hell, let's give the two UPSs tags. Just for kicks. -- "There are two limits that this standard places on the number of characters in a line. Each line of characters MUST be no more than 998 characters, and SHOULD be no more than 78 characters, excluding the CRLF." -- rfc2822 - Internet Message Format
- References:
- Names for Office b0xen
- From: Chris Peredun <cp@cleannorth.org>
- Names for Office b0xen
- Prev by Date: Names for Office b0xen
- Next by Date: Jabba's going nuts
- Prev by thread: Names for Office b0xen
- Next by thread: Jabba's going nuts
- Index(es):