[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: your mail
- To: techies@lists.cleannorth.org
- Subject: Re: your mail
- From: "steve lewis" <loki2607@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 18:04:39 -0000
- List-Help: http://lists.cleannorth.org/
- List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.cleannorth.org/
- Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:12:11 -0400
- Resent-From: techies@lists.cleannorth.org
- Resent-Message-ID: <0C74kD.A.A5C.7_kK7@skirnir>
- Resent-Sender: techies-request@lists.cleannorth.org
>From: Dan Brosemer <odin@cleannorth.org> >To: steve lewis <loki2607@hotmail.com> >CC: techies@lists.cleannorth.org >Subject: Re: your mail >Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:33:06 -0400 > >On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 04:16:30PM -0000, steve lewis wrote: > > Sounds fairly close to what we did. > > thanx to you and dave for your time. > > > > > > >From: Dan Brosemer <odin@cleannorth.org> > > >To: steve lewis <loki2607@hotmail.com> > > >CC: techies@lists.cleannorth.org > > >Subject: Re: your mail > > >Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:32:54 -0400 > >Inserting this in the list archives at the same time as doing some >user-education... > >Steve. There are many good reasons to use the email lists rather than send >mail directly to me. > >1. There are other people than me who can be just as, or more, helpful. >This case is a perfect example. Did I come up with _any_ useful >information? No. Not a shred. The useful guidance came from Kathie and >Dave who both found the problem independently. Dave found it two hours >earlier, and, so, had the two of you been communicating throught the list, >you'd have had your printout two hours earlier, not wasted my time, and >probably freed up some of Kathie's as well. > >2. I get on the order of 500-6000 messages/day depending on the day. To >deal with this, I set up filtering rules, and mail coming over the Clean >North lists gets a certain precedence. You bypass that when you send to my >personal address. That creates more work for me, and it's annoying. > >This is why I said on Day 1 that the best ways to reach me are: > #1 email the appropriate list (http://lists.cleannorth.org/ is a list of > lists) > #2 email me directly > #3 icq for the ~4 hours/day I can be reached that way (2624301) > #32767 phone > >3. The lists are archived at http://lists.cleannorth.org/. Anyone can >search them. This is useful if we get the same problem occurring down the >road. Right now, there are three messages in there on this topic... >they're >all from me. I have received another six that should be in there. After I >send this one, that will be four in 10 messages searchable. That seriously >reduces the quality of that archive. > >4. It's not hard! Just hit "Reply All" instead of "Reply"! > >5. It makes you think more before shoving your problem on someone else. >It's all too easy to just fire off a question to an individual, but when >you're sending to a group of people, and your message is going to be >publically archived forever, you tend to to try a little harder to be >clear, >concise, and intelligent. (ie, you're more likely to report all error >messages, and the exact details of what you're attempting to do). > >6. I don't have time to do all the admin work at the office, and it >shouldn't be expected of me. See Mark Verber's article on how many >full-time admins a site needs: >http://www.verber.com/mark/sysadm/how-many-admins.html > >We weigh in at: >.5 for users >6 for OSs >1 for machines >0 for tight coupling >5 subsystems >0 additional segment >8 security >--- >20.5 > >"Junior admins can handle 4 units. A really good experienced admin can hack >8-12 units." > >And that's expecting someone working full-time!!! > >So why do people expectg me to be doing all the admin work enough that >rather than emailing the _email_list_of_admins_, _I_ get the email??? > >.5 for users >3 for OSs >1 for machines >0 for tight coupling >5 for subsystems >0 for additional segments >4 for security >--- >13.5 > >That will, by comparison, be relaxing. Maybe by Monday! > >My point? Other people don't mind putting in a little time too, as Jim and >Dave, especially, have demonstrated. > >So when I ask you to send to the list, and not to me directly, please, >_please_, just send to the list! I don't think that's too much to ask. > >-Dan > >-- >"There are two limits that this standard places on the number of >characters in a line. Each line of characters MUST be no more than >998 characters, and SHOULD be no more than 78 characters, excluding >the CRLF." -- rfc2822 - Internet Message Format _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
- Prev by Date: Re: your mail
- Next by Date: General update
- Prev by thread: Re: your mail
- Next by thread: Re: Color printing.
- Index(es):