[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fw: location progress?
- To: Peter McLarty <petmcla@soonet.ca>, "book@lists.cleannorth.org" <book@lists.cleannorth.org>
- Subject: Re: Fw: location progress?
- From: Kathie Brosemer <kathie@cleannorth.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 19:34:23 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <006601c1fd9b$0daaf370$9865fea9@Fred>
- References: <006601c1fd9b$0daaf370$9865fea9@Fred>
- Resent-Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 19:31:30 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: book@lists.cleannorth.org
- Resent-Message-ID: <KI5taD.A.4kG.SLZ58@bobafett>
- Resent-Sender: book-request@lists.cleannorth.org
Peter, is this the Trbovich building you're referring to? thanks k --On Friday, May 17, 2002 7:56 AM -0400 Peter McLarty <petmcla@soonet.ca> wrote: > > To all committee members... > Peter > > PS... I took a look at the building last evening and peeked through the > windows of the east side. The loading dock is actually INSIDE the big > garage doors. There appears to be enough room on the loading dock to > handle 24 pallets (one truck load). There are 3 garage bays, so that > books could be stored inside right there and we would not have to move > them into the "back" office space. ie...this site will work! We would > have to load a transport as soon as we had 24 pallets. Sounds > vague/confusing???....bottom line is we can confirm this location > offficially on Tuesday!!! ----- Original Message ----- > From: Peter McLarty > To: Kathie Brosemer > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:27 PM > Subject: location progress? > > > Wheeeewww!! > We have a new contact at the PUC...Al Tourigney. He tells me that we can > have the loading dock on the east side of the building for sure... but > there is not a lot of storage space right at the dock. There are a lot of > empty offices in the back that we can use for storage , but this would > mean "double handling". He is leaving town first thing in the morning so > that I cannot get to check out the site until Tuesday. We can have either > site for the full month! The city is still using the west side of the > building, which is ideal. I am attempting to see if we can "share" the > space with the city (if they have not vacated it on time). The PUC has > said that we can have the building "gratis" if we give them public > billing for their assistance. We should have a definite go by Tuesday > evening. > Peter
- References:
- Fw: location progress?
- From: "Peter McLarty" <petmcla@soonet.ca>
- Fw: location progress?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fw: location progress?
- Next by Date: Trbovich building
- Prev by thread: Re: Fw: location progress?
- Next by thread: Trbovich building
- Index(es):