[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fw: location progress?
- To: Peter McLarty <petmcla@soonet.ca>
- Subject: Re: Fw: location progress?
- From: Kathie Brosemer <kathie@cleannorth.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 09:51:26 -0400
- Cc: book@lists.cleannorth.org
- In-Reply-To: <006601c1fd9b$0daaf370$9865fea9@Fred>
- References: <006601c1fd9b$0daaf370$9865fea9@Fred>
- Resent-Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 09:52:28 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: book@lists.cleannorth.org
- Resent-Message-ID: <H-nN5C.A.7cH.csQ58@bobafett>
- Resent-Sender: book-request@lists.cleannorth.org
Great work, Peter! This is exciting. So after Tuesday we can start Chris on a poster and other ways of reaching the public... I think a bookmark at the library and booksellers would be a fun idea. I'll spend some time this weekend with my Pagemaker and see what I can do. thanks for this! kathie Quoting Peter McLarty <petmcla@soonet.ca>: > To all committee members... > Peter > > PS... I took a look at the building last evening and peeked through > the > windows of the east side. The loading dock is actually INSIDE the big > > garage doors. There appears to be enough room on the loading dock to > > handle 24 pallets (one truck load). There are 3 garage bays, so that > > books could be stored inside right there and we would not have to > move > them into the "back" office space. ie...this site will work! We would > > have to load a transport as soon as we had 24 pallets. Sounds > vague/confusing???....bottom line is we can confirm this location > offficially on Tuesday!!! > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Peter McLarty > To: Kathie Brosemer > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:27 PM > Subject: location progress? > > > Wheeeewww!! > We have a new contact at the PUC...Al Tourigney. He tells me that we > can > have the loading dock on the east side of the building for sure... > but > there is not a lot of storage space right at the dock. There are a > lot > of empty offices in the back that we can use for storage , but this > > would mean "double handling". He is leaving town first thing in the > > morning so that I cannot get to check out the site until Tuesday. We > can > have either site for the full month! > The city is still using the west side of the building, which is > ideal. I > am attempting to see if we can "share" the space with the city (if > they > have not vacated it on time). > The PUC has said that we can have the building "gratis" if we give > them > public billing for their assistance. > We should have a definite go by Tuesday evening. > Peter > > -- O my soul, do not aspire to immortal life, but exhaust the limits of the possible. - Pindar
- References:
- Fw: location progress?
- From: "Peter McLarty" <petmcla@soonet.ca>
- Fw: location progress?
- Prev by Date: Fw: location progress?
- Next by Date: Re: Fw: location progress?
- Prev by thread: Fw: location progress?
- Next by thread: Re: Fw: location progress?
- Index(es):